Shroud of turin carbon dating results

There's a drawing from the 1190s of what some scholars believe was the Shroud.

A French knight wrote about seeing such a cloth in Constantinople before the city was sacked by crusaders in 1204. In 1898, Secondo Pia was allowed to photograph the Shroud.

[See “Jesus’ Wife” Articles in HTR: Initial Thoughts in Larry Hurtado’s Blog.] The observation which may interest you is the huge discrepancy in C14 dating by experts with the possibility of contamination effects. (And recent statistical analysis of the SOT results indicate that they also were inconsistent among samples.) (I believe there was also a problem with a control sample.) People make a big deal of C14 testing, when it probably is not very reliable for certain materials. The one report (by Hodgins) notes the curious date-result (405-350 BCE and/or 307-209 BCE), about a thousand years earlier than the date from the other carbon-dating test (659-969 CE), and Hodgins suggests some kind of contamination of the sample.

It might be noted that just because someone is a specialist in some field of science does _not_ at all mean they are statistical or even methodological experts. But I’d assume that a contamination would come from something later than the ancient setting, and so skew the date later, not earlier. The Shroud of Turin may be the real burial cloth of Jesus.

He's convinced it was what sparked the rapid spread of Christianity, as it was taken from Jerusalem to Galilee, then to Damascus, where he believes Paul saw it and became a Christian.

bathroom-blowjob

On this Easter Sunday morning our Cover Story is reported by Martha Teichner: It's possibly the greatest "What if ..." in the world. and the faint imprint on it, the image of a man who has been tortured and crucified, really is Christ himself?But if the newer thread is about half of what was tested – and some evidence suggests that – it is possible that the cloth is from the time of Christ.No one has a good idea how front and back images of a crucified man came to be on the cloth.Working 24 hours a day, they set out to discover how the image was made, and if it was a fake.

Note that there is a new "Jesus’ Wife" publication. The proposed dates of the two tests are out from each other by several hundred years.

What if the Shroud of Turin really is the burial cloth Jesus was wrapped in . The last time the Shroud was on view, for six weeks in 2010, more than two million people saw it, even though in 1988, after a carbon dating test, it was declared a medieval fake - dating from between 12. But tell that to the throngs who waited hours for the chance to spend seconds before it in reverent silence.

dduvs.dp.ua

84 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>